Talk:Andrew Wray
From WikiPOBia
(Difference between revisions)
(response) |
Sic Transit (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:Sic Transit|Sic Transit]] 22:15, 4 August 2008 (BST) | [[User:Sic Transit|Sic Transit]] 22:15, 4 August 2008 (BST) | ||
:Agreed, his sexuality is quite complicated, but to merely label it "deviant" is probably inappropriate. See what I changed. [[User:Aquinas|Aquinas]] 16:31, 6 August 2008 (BST) | :Agreed, his sexuality is quite complicated, but to merely label it "deviant" is probably inappropriate. See what I changed. [[User:Aquinas|Aquinas]] 16:31, 6 August 2008 (BST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Yes, a better description and less likely to give offence. [[User:Sic Transit|Sic Transit]] 04:23, 7 August 2008 (BST) |
Current revision as of 03:23, 7 August 2008
I wonder if it is appropriate to call Wray a sexual deviant. To be accurate it would require O'Brian to say or suggest this aspect by some behaviour. By the standards of the time , brothels or S&M would not be deviant, e.g. the Marquis of Sade. As for today, if it is relevant, Max Mosley's hijinks would suggest the modern UK is quite tolerant. Sic Transit 22:15, 4 August 2008 (BST)
- Agreed, his sexuality is quite complicated, but to merely label it "deviant" is probably inappropriate. See what I changed. Aquinas 16:31, 6 August 2008 (BST)
Yes, a better description and less likely to give offence. Sic Transit 04:23, 7 August 2008 (BST)