Talk:Non-Aubrey-Maturin Books
From WikiPOBia
(Difference between revisions)
LadyShelley (Talk | contribs) (question) |
(→Needed?: Yes, template is possible) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Needed? == | == Needed? == | ||
Since there is already an article listing the [[Complete works]], do we need a second that is non-canon stories? --[[User:LadyShelley|LadyShelley]] 01:17, 3 July 2007 (BST) | Since there is already an article listing the [[Complete works]], do we need a second that is non-canon stories? --[[User:LadyShelley|LadyShelley]] 01:17, 3 July 2007 (BST) | ||
| + | :I'd say No.[[User:Czrisher|Czrisher]] 02:37, 4 July 2007 (BST) | ||
| + | :: I tend to agree. I think Adam started this one; I'll wait and see if he chimes in with what his plan was before deleting it. --[[User:LadyShelley|LadyShelley]] 16:07, 4 July 2007 (BST) | ||
| + | :::I started on this before the [[Complete works]] page was ever created. So why did someone start that when this was already in place? ;-) I thought, that as we had the Aubreyad listed on one page, it seemed a good idea to list the other works on another page. In the same vein, if we have the Complete works page, do we really need a separate page listing just the [[Aubrey-Maturin series]]? In other words should we delete this page and the [[Aubrey-Maturin series]] or the [[Complete works]] or neither and use judicious linkages? [[User:Aquinas|Aquinas]] 03:37, 5 July 2007 (BST) | ||
| + | ::::I think the Complete works article should stay just as a specific jumping off point for all of the stories. The Aubrey-Maturin article serves the same purpose. I guess my question for this one is, can it be used as a good jumping off point for the non canon works? Adam can you make a similar template for the non canon stuff as you did for the A-M series that could use this article as the jump off point? --[[User:LadyShelley|LadyShelley]] 01:51, 6 July 2007 (BST) | ||
| + | Certainly could, but it may not be for a couple of days. [[User:Aquinas|Aquinas]] 04:29, 6 July 2007 (BST) | ||
Current revision as of 03:29, 6 July 2007
Needed?
Since there is already an article listing the Complete works, do we need a second that is non-canon stories? --LadyShelley 01:17, 3 July 2007 (BST)
- I'd say No.Czrisher 02:37, 4 July 2007 (BST)
- I tend to agree. I think Adam started this one; I'll wait and see if he chimes in with what his plan was before deleting it. --LadyShelley 16:07, 4 July 2007 (BST)
- I started on this before the Complete works page was ever created. So why did someone start that when this was already in place? ;-) I thought, that as we had the Aubreyad listed on one page, it seemed a good idea to list the other works on another page. In the same vein, if we have the Complete works page, do we really need a separate page listing just the Aubrey-Maturin series? In other words should we delete this page and the Aubrey-Maturin series or the Complete works or neither and use judicious linkages? Aquinas 03:37, 5 July 2007 (BST)
- I think the Complete works article should stay just as a specific jumping off point for all of the stories. The Aubrey-Maturin article serves the same purpose. I guess my question for this one is, can it be used as a good jumping off point for the non canon works? Adam can you make a similar template for the non canon stuff as you did for the A-M series that could use this article as the jump off point? --LadyShelley 01:51, 6 July 2007 (BST)
- I started on this before the Complete works page was ever created. So why did someone start that when this was already in place? ;-) I thought, that as we had the Aubreyad listed on one page, it seemed a good idea to list the other works on another page. In the same vein, if we have the Complete works page, do we really need a separate page listing just the Aubrey-Maturin series? In other words should we delete this page and the Aubrey-Maturin series or the Complete works or neither and use judicious linkages? Aquinas 03:37, 5 July 2007 (BST)
- I tend to agree. I think Adam started this one; I'll wait and see if he chimes in with what his plan was before deleting it. --LadyShelley 16:07, 4 July 2007 (BST)
Certainly could, but it may not be for a couple of days. Aquinas 04:29, 6 July 2007 (BST)
