Talk:Errata of Five Volume Set
From WikiPOBia
(→All errata?) |
LadyShelley (Talk | contribs) (reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | |||
== All errata? == | == All errata? == | ||
I think this could be better used as a reference for all versions instead of just the five volume set. It might also work better incorporated into the book articles themselves as opposed to separate articles for each publication. --[[User:LadyShelley|LadyShelley]] 05:37, 28 April 2009 (BST) | I think this could be better used as a reference for all versions instead of just the five volume set. It might also work better incorporated into the book articles themselves as opposed to separate articles for each publication. --[[User:LadyShelley|LadyShelley]] 05:37, 28 April 2009 (BST) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
I've found the only the five volume set has so many blatant errors. Many of these errors are not in the original hardcover set. I own both and use the hardcover set to double check the volumes. I wouldn't want to imply that they are in every edition by incorporating this errata into the book articles themselves. Also trying to figure out the page and line references for every edition would be very difficult. [[User:Lunumbra|Lunumbra]] 11:11, 29 April 2009 (BST) | I've found the only the five volume set has so many blatant errors. Many of these errors are not in the original hardcover set. I own both and use the hardcover set to double check the volumes. I wouldn't want to imply that they are in every edition by incorporating this errata into the book articles themselves. Also trying to figure out the page and line references for every edition would be very difficult. [[User:Lunumbra|Lunumbra]] 11:11, 29 April 2009 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The information at this site : [http://www.hmssurprise.org/Resources/Errata.php Gunroom errata] could be worked into this (with proper permission) so the article is useful for more than one set of the books. --[[User:LadyShelley|LadyShelley]] 02:46, 30 April 2009 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 01:46, 30 April 2009
All errata?
I think this could be better used as a reference for all versions instead of just the five volume set. It might also work better incorporated into the book articles themselves as opposed to separate articles for each publication. --LadyShelley 05:37, 28 April 2009 (BST)
I've found the only the five volume set has so many blatant errors. Many of these errors are not in the original hardcover set. I own both and use the hardcover set to double check the volumes. I wouldn't want to imply that they are in every edition by incorporating this errata into the book articles themselves. Also trying to figure out the page and line references for every edition would be very difficult. Lunumbra 11:11, 29 April 2009 (BST)
The information at this site : Gunroom errata could be worked into this (with proper permission) so the article is useful for more than one set of the books. --LadyShelley 02:46, 30 April 2009 (BST)
