Talk:Shelmerston
From WikiPOBia
(Difference between revisions)
(→WikiPOBia Connexion: I prefer not) |
(Embarassed gratitude) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Should we connect the name to its current affiliation with the WikiPOBia? Or is that too esoteric (or too revealing)?[[User:Czrisher|Czrisher]] 15:03, 5 June 2007 (BST) | Should we connect the name to its current affiliation with the WikiPOBia? Or is that too esoteric (or too revealing)?[[User:Czrisher|Czrisher]] 15:03, 5 June 2007 (BST) | ||
:I would say not, I don't know if it would help hackers or not but I think it is unneccessary here which is open to the full web. [[User:Aquinas|Aquinas]] 15:15, 5 June 2007 (BST) | :I would say not, I don't know if it would help hackers or not but I think it is unneccessary here which is open to the full web. [[User:Aquinas|Aquinas]] 15:15, 5 June 2007 (BST) | ||
| + | ::Wisdom. I'm glad that I wasn't overly transparent in phrasing my question and, indeed, somewhat regret posing it at all. Should we consider removing this thread? Or let it stand in case others should consider the same idea?[[User:Czrisher|Czrisher]] 15:31, 5 June 2007 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 14:31, 5 June 2007
WikiPOBia Connexion
Should we connect the name to its current affiliation with the WikiPOBia? Or is that too esoteric (or too revealing)?Czrisher 15:03, 5 June 2007 (BST)
- I would say not, I don't know if it would help hackers or not but I think it is unneccessary here which is open to the full web. Aquinas 15:15, 5 June 2007 (BST)
- Wisdom. I'm glad that I wasn't overly transparent in phrasing my question and, indeed, somewhat regret posing it at all. Should we consider removing this thread? Or let it stand in case others should consider the same idea?Czrisher 15:31, 5 June 2007 (BST)
