Talk:Non-Aubrey-Maturin Books
From WikiPOBia
(Difference between revisions)
LadyShelley (Talk | contribs) (reply) |
(→Needed?: Ding dong) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I'd say No.[[User:Czrisher|Czrisher]] 02:37, 4 July 2007 (BST) | :I'd say No.[[User:Czrisher|Czrisher]] 02:37, 4 July 2007 (BST) | ||
:: I tend to agree. I think Adam started this one; I'll wait and see if he chimes in with what his plan was before deleting it. --[[User:LadyShelley|LadyShelley]] 16:07, 4 July 2007 (BST) | :: I tend to agree. I think Adam started this one; I'll wait and see if he chimes in with what his plan was before deleting it. --[[User:LadyShelley|LadyShelley]] 16:07, 4 July 2007 (BST) | ||
| + | :::I didn't see/know about the [[Complete works]] when I started this one. I thought, that as we had the Aubreyad listed on one page, it seemed a good idea to list the other works on another page. In the same vein, if we have the Complete works page, do we really need a separate page listing just the [[Aubrey-Maturin series]]? In other words should we delete this page and the [[Aubrey-Maturin series]] or the [[Complete works]] or neither and use judicious linkages? [[User:Aquinas|Aquinas]] 03:37, 5 July 2007 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 02:37, 5 July 2007
Needed?
Since there is already an article listing the Complete works, do we need a second that is non-canon stories? --LadyShelley 01:17, 3 July 2007 (BST)
- I'd say No.Czrisher 02:37, 4 July 2007 (BST)
- I tend to agree. I think Adam started this one; I'll wait and see if he chimes in with what his plan was before deleting it. --LadyShelley 16:07, 4 July 2007 (BST)
- I didn't see/know about the Complete works when I started this one. I thought, that as we had the Aubreyad listed on one page, it seemed a good idea to list the other works on another page. In the same vein, if we have the Complete works page, do we really need a separate page listing just the Aubrey-Maturin series? In other words should we delete this page and the Aubrey-Maturin series or the Complete works or neither and use judicious linkages? Aquinas 03:37, 5 July 2007 (BST)
- I tend to agree. I think Adam started this one; I'll wait and see if he chimes in with what his plan was before deleting it. --LadyShelley 16:07, 4 July 2007 (BST)
